The Host
Terri Thampan 804
I have recently
read the "book" "The Host" by Stephenie Meyer. I started reading the book with hopes that
Stephenie Meyer had made a good book (the Twilight Saga, which I have already
read, are horrible books!) and determination to actually read the book, the
whole thing. Sadly, I was greatly disappointed, for both were wrong. Now, I
know I shouldn't be really writing a blog for a book I don't like, but, I only
just started my newest book, and, I'm a good ranter/rantist.
The book, is about
how “Aliens” also known as souls are taking over the world. They are the
kindest, most perfect beings. And they take over the world to help make it
perfect. Wanderer, is our protagonist, and she learns to love humans or
something like that, because I didn’t finish the book.
Now, first of all,
why don't I like this book? I have many reasons for disliking this book. One, I
hate how the "aliens" are being made to be "perfect". In
the book, they are referred to as souls, and are described as "all things
good. Compassionate, patient, kind, good, Virtuous, and full of love".
First off, as a person who likes darker stories and characters and plots in
general, the whole description, was kind of stupid. What the author tries to
do, is make them the perfect characters (*cough Sparkly Vampire Edward cough*)
but epic-ly fails. What SMeyer describes humans as in her story, are vile,
violent, evil creatures. She gives us many flaws, as a species in general.
SMeyer, knows perfectly well that people aren't perfect, thus including herself
as she is a person. Because of that imperfection, it's really hard to write a
perfect character, a.k.a the Mary Sue: epitome of bad character writing,
because there will always be flaws. The "aliens" in SMeyer's book,
are very flawed.
First off, they're
conceited. They think themselves as the perfect race, and thus, deem themselves
worthy to go and change the rest of the universe by taking over the bodies of
other species, on other planets. Well, I don't know about you, but if someone
thinks they're perfect enough, and start changing the world to be just like
them, that's pretty egotistical, and in my definition, a character flaw. If
that was done on purpose, it would have been more tolerable, but throughout all
that I have read, it paints the Aliens as the more "supreme" race,
better than the humans.
Secondly, the
aliens are described as kind, and compassionate. Again, they are supposed to be
all things good (blegh). Really though, if they were all things good, they
would have thought, 'Oh, this body that I'm being a parasite to, is actually someone
else's and it was never mine, so I shouldn't steal it, from them.' But really,
Wanderer, or Wanda (I skipped to the end before I put the book back, just to
see how it ends) decided to give back the body to Melanie, and like die or something,
because she wanted to be selfless. That pissed me off to no end. First off,
they aren’t being selfless by giving back the bodies to the rightful “hosts”. That’s
like saying; a guy who stole a valuable artifact, something priceless, and gave
it back is a selfless man. Being selfless doesn’t work like that. If they were
the ones who gave their bodies up out of their own free will, to others, that
would be selfless.
Another thing is, the whole race is
prejudiced. They are all prejudiced towards the seekers, who are basically like
police. They shun the seekers for choosing a life of violence, which they do so
to protect the other souls from dangers. They protect souls from humans, and
basically, kill off stragglers that can be violent. They are greatly disliked
by many of the regular souls. I think this is also counted as a character flaw
of the whole race; they are prejudiced against their own kind, and think of
humans as barbaric monsters.
What I didn’t
like, was how SMeyer made the character interactions. Melanie, the host for
Wanderer, shows different memories throughout the text. Her first memory of
Jared, the man she is in love with, has him kissing her as soon as they meet,
and he finds out she’s a human, not a soul using a host. I liked how Melanie
forcefully removed him from her person because really, even if aliens are taking
over the world, a girl who has the very determined, and strong, dominant type
of personality like Melanie would not let some random guy kiss her. But what
really aggravates me was that as soon as she got the kiss, Melanie realized she
wanted more, and let him kiss her again. What the hell? You don’t kiss a random
person you just meet! And then, it makes them really close, but like in a span
of weeks, but we barely see the romance, except for how Melanie’s all over him,
and wanting to kiss him, (BellaxEdward), when there have been no scenes with the
characters getting closer. Also, The Seeker (who sadly has no name and is my
favorite character) comes off very annoying to both Wanda and Melanie. Now, I
don’t really care about that, but Melanie and Wanda get closer through this
dislike for the Seeker, and then Melanie just starts spilling all her secrets
to Wanda. I don’t care how much an alien invading your body is infatuated with
the idea of your lover because of your memories, you don’t just spill all your
secrets to them because you think, oh they won’t hurt them, when one has already
took over your father and got to you (even though you escaped), which hurt you!
Plus, when the Seeker seems really annoying, Melanie thinks ‘Let’s kill her!’
and Wanderer (Wanda) is like, ‘this is why we took over, ‘because you humans
are so violent!’ That just angered me to no extent. First of all, if someone
says that, they are CRAZY! Not all humans go around killing! And even if it is
a survival thing, we aren’t going to kill you, unless you pose as harm to us. This
just got me so mad; I hit my head against a table.
Now, I think this
book would be so much better if it was a romance between The Seeker (who
deserves a name) and Fords Deep Waters (who deserves a better name). Now, the
pairing might seem a bit like a crack pairing, but I really believe they would
be a good couple. If Fords, was the kind, good guy doctor, who suddenly finds a
temperament when Seeker is around, learns to live a little and understand
Seeker, was the main story romance, I think I might have read the book. Seeker,
if you couldn’t have told, is my favorite character in that whole book. I think
it would have been much better if it was told through her perspective, rather
than Wanderer’s. I can see Seeker as a more cool character. She’s a woman, who
is determined, stubborn, passionate, not afraid to be violent, and can deal
with the prejudice her world has against people like her. I feel like she would
be an amazingly strong character, and that she is one of the more tolerable
alien characters, because she herself is more human like, ad more realistic.
The last thing
that really bugged me about this story was the whole “For the Greater Good.” I
read that line a couple of times and it put me so on edge it wasn’t even funny.
The reason why, I don’t like that phrase, is because of Harry Potter.
Grindelwald, tried using that as his saying, when he tried to exterminate all
the muggle-born children. Dumbledore, as awesome as a character he is, he makes
mistakes, which he humbly admits to, and has been quoted doing things for the
greater good. Not all his choices are the best, and it puts me on edge when
people say that line. It feels like they’re trying to justify what they do.
Adolf Hitler must have used that line, “it’s for the greater good if we kill
all Jewish people” so I’m a bit wary. But I’m going to go do something you
should never do with Stephenie Meyer’s books. I’m going to look very deeply in
to this book (which is bad for your health and mine) and say that, the aliens
were trying to justify themselves. That deep inside them, they knew they weren’t
as perfect as they said they were, and so tried to justify their weird craving
for immortality by saying it was for the greater good.
Oh, another thing I
forgot to mention. These Aliens are basically just striving for immortality,
switching hosts like that, and living multiple lives (Reminds me of Orochimaru
from Naruto). They don’t need to die unless they want to. Voldemort, and many
other super villains must be rolling in their graves.
Terri,
ReplyDeleteI agree that every character has flaws. That no character could be "perfect" because all of them tend to have at least one flaw, in some way. Like, if the aliens are taking over a species body, therefore taking their life away from them to live longer, wouldn't that be considered cruel, bad? These aliens are taking somebody's life away to make them "perfect" as they are, when these "aliens" aren't actually "perfect". I agree that not all humans are violent, we only tend be violent if we feel like scared, or threatened and if humans have ever been violent towards these "aliens" it's because these "aliens" are taking over the human's body. Overall, I enjoyed reading your blog post and hope that you respond back to my comment.
Jo,
DeleteI found myself agreeing to your comment, and I thank you for your kind words. Now, as I just made replies going from bottom to top, I will have to ask you to refer to Angel's response which had my conspiracy theory hidden in there. I realize, as you are a sci-fiction lover, and love anything to do with space (aliens fall into that category), you would be very offended by reading this book. This book pretty much ruined your precious Aliens in the same way the Twilight Series (why must it be a Saga?) ruined vampires for many people. Stephenie Meyer tries to use the same formula that worked for her, she tried to make a love story for a being that's supernatural or and e.t. She tries to make these characters perfect, but like for Edward, this was a failure. She basically, uses something that no self respecting reader or writer would ever like/use: she put Mary Sues,a.k.a Self Inserts, a.k.a. The Author made into the most perfect being. In twilight, Bella Swan is a cliched Mary sue, who has no personality what so ever that you can truly say she has in all of the books, except for dull. She's a very submissive character, and in the second book, you can tell she's a bit crazy (listening to voices in her head). But really, Edward, the guy who was supposed to be perfect, is just an emo kid. He hates himself, yet he's full of himself. He calls himself a monster, yet he never thinks for others. He's shallow. He only cares for himself, ever caring for what Bella felt when he broke up with her. He says he knows best, and doesn't let Bella choose for herself. He didn't let her become a vampire until her life was in danger. He's a brat, who wants things his way, unlike Louis, in The Interview With A Vampire. Louis, learns how quick human life is, and tries to help out the people he cares about, and give good advice. I prefer Louis over Edward. Sorry, how did I get onto Twilight? xD
But yes, Wanderer, or Wanda, while might not be the more obvious of self inserts, she is of course, a Mary Sue. The most unoriginal character ever. I have watched a girl post her views on youtube about This book, and apparently, Wanda just gets away with being so gentle and frail. So basically, she's useless. Apparently, there are also very stupid names for medicine in this book as well, like "Heal", how original. Plus, Wanda, like her race is prejudiced, finds herself better than others, she clearly says in the book, 'that's why we had to take over, because you humans are so violent,' or something like that! It's kind of annoying. So really, want a character that actually has depth, don't look at Stephenie Meyer anytime soon!
Hey Terri I thought your blog post was very good. I loved how you described the characters so clearly, even though I can tell the book is a little confusing. I agree though, that nobody can be "perfect" and what you said about the aliens being everything good just seemed cheesy to me too. I liked how you connected The Host to a lot of different books, which showed you must've read it carefully because there are a lot of good ideas in there!
ReplyDeleteGreat Post!
Tess
Tess,
DeleteThank you for such kind words, but really, I read a couple of chapters in the book, and I quit it. I can tell you, I skipped to the end, because really it did't deserve to be fully read through. Apparently it's just a random romance novel, and Stephenie Meyer just wanted to mess up with more of our favorite creatures. xC I personally think, if she made some of the ideas I came up with like the conspiracy (check Angel's response) then the book would be so much more interesting to read. But really, this book is not worth your time, with cliched perfect characters. What angers me a lot though is that the "souls" have counselors, meaning the souls were based off human good traits and stuff, which makes them even more ignorant: like Europeans killing of Native Americans for their beliefs that they are barbaric, so do these souls wish to exterminate humans who feel threatened and more like them then they know. I connected this to other books because I did something you should never do, I over read into this book, it is just a cheesy romance novel, but I tried to go into it deeper and that is not recommended. Because at first you think, 'OMG, this person might actually be a good author with all these deep meanings and hidden agendas', but really, these are just plot holes and errors, that if fixed just leave out any creativity. xD I really did read into this, and I hope you will never try to, it hurts your brain so much when you realize the things you were thinking that you thought were super deep, were never intended to be there in the first place. This is simply a story to be a story. xD
Terri,
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, the character does have flaws, since like you said, no one is perfect. It does make them coincided and all that for even thinking that, taking over people and being prejudice to other races, well...that's not making them so perfect. No one is perfect no matter how much they argue, kill, and disagree with people.
Personally, I think your blog post was great, you refer back to quotes, sayings, and other books, you gave your opinions (clearly) and you crystal clear on that characters feelings, thoughts, and some actions.
To challenge you, have you ever tried to think of it from the point of view of the characters? Have you tried to see it from their eyes? Wouldn't you want to live a long life, have immortality, thinking you're doing something 'right' and 'good' for yourself? Or would you rather die like the 'bad guys'? Think about it from the other point of view, I feel like you're missing that.
Angel,
DeleteFrom their eyes, they can do no wrong, and that is called being full of yourself, or being conceited. I myself, am not that conceited, as I admit I have flaws, and even acknowledge I too have times where I act conceited, but if someone told me I could live forever by feeding off another's life, I would decline (Funny how Smeyer's books are about creatures that live off other being's life forces, veggie vampires, still kill animals/lives). I personally believe, that if I was raised in that type of environment, I myself would never find a flaw with myself. But, no one is raised in that type of environment,and doesn't deal with repercussions. Sure, they might see it that way for a while, but when will it happen that some seekers will rebel? Will grow tired of the endless scorn they are burdened with for embracing their more animal like qualities, and their more human like qualities, like being stubborn. In the book, it says that they have no superiors, everyone is an equal, I think that is a bunch of Morris (sorry Morris :<). At least one of the souls would be power hungry enough to control all those gullible souls for fools. And the soul on top, is the one who succeeded where other dark lords failed. I take back my earlier statement, the dark lords must be rich with envy!
This soul somehow manipulated all the other souls to believe they are perfect, and that they are all equal, and that they are the perfect beings, and they can do no wrong, while oblivious to the evil they do, because THEY ARE BEING CONTROLLED! Damn, look at the conspiracy theory I just made up! No way did Smeyer truly intend for this, I'm gonna brag and say I'm an amazing reader xD, but really, sooner or later, the black sheep of these souls, the seekers, will soon rebel, and bring a revolution, and it will all lead back again to the lost humanity being reborn in these souls. Wow, my typing finger hurt xD
Terri, I really like this blog post.Since I have never read "The Host" but I was planning on reading like you I thought maybe this Stephanie Meyer could write a good story. I guess I'll just have to read it for myself. Your post was thought provoking and you. You added your thinking and opinions and back it up. It was interesting because it felt like you were talking to me. Also it was a long blog post filled with a lot of thinking. It was like a novel! I can see you spent a lot of work into it and time!!!
ReplyDeleteGOOD JOB!
I love your blog!
Bing,
Deletethanks, and it's only this long because I like ranting about books xD But yeah, the book is pretty confusing, especially when you're trying to just rationalize how the characters are. The book is turning into a movie apparently, how sad, but I respect those that make this book into a movie because really, it isn't much to work with. Looking back, I can actually relate this book to "Uglies" (my conspiracy theories anyways) because in "Uglies", the Pretties are pretty much "perfect".
-Terri ;>